Hoka Cielo X 2.0 Review: Supershoe for Speed, Power, and Propulsion
GEAR & SHOE REVIEWS
Hoka has taken a bold step with the Cielo X 2.0, positioning it as one of their most aggressive racing shoes to date. Built for runners seeking efficiency at high speeds, it brings notable updates to the original Cielo X while clearly distinguishing itself in Hoka’s lineup.
This review covers design, on-foot experience, performance across paces, and key differences compared to the original version.
Design & Build
The Cielo X 2.0 packs all the hallmarks of a supershoe:
Dual-density PEBA midsole: Highly responsive and bouncy, the foam compresses and rebounds quickly, giving that energy return essential for fast tempos and racing. Compared to the original, the 2.0 feels more forward-leaning thanks to changes in midsole geometry and carbon plate placement.
Full-length carbon plate: The stiffer, more aggressive rocker encourages a forefoot strike, giving a pronounced racing feel. The original Cielo X was versatile and forgiving; the 2.0 prioritizes propulsion.
WA-legal stack height: With 40 mm in the heel, a 7 mm drop, and weighing 6.9 oz (194 g) in my size, the 2.0 sits at the upper limit for supershoes. While slightly heavier than the OG (6.5 oz / 183 g), it feels faster on the foot due to the redesigned midsole.
Breathable jacquard mesh upper: Structured and airy, the upper locks the foot in place without feeling restrictive. Compared to the original’s stretchier knit, the 2.0 offers a more precise fit with a slightly narrower profile, emphasizing speed and efficiency.
On-Foot Feel & Personal Experience
The 2.0 immediately stands apart from the original. The OG handled everything from easy runs to faster tempos, but the 2.0 is a specialized tool: aggressive, forward-pitched, and built for racing.
Over several tempo runs and an 18-mile segment of the LA Marathon, the shoe felt surprisingly smooth and efficient. The aggressive rocker encouraged a forefoot strike without compromising stability, while the dual-density foam kept energy return high. Walking around on race weekends was comfortable, making it versatile enough for travel, though its focus is clearly speed.
Having run both versions, it’s clear that the original Cielo X excelled in versatility—it could handle easy runs, tempo sessions, and travel with equal comfort. The 2.0, in contrast, feels like a purpose-built racing tool, ideal for marathon or half-marathon pace work. The narrower, more structured fit of the 2.0 emphasizes speed and efficiency, while the OG offered a more forgiving ride.
Performance Across Paces
Easy running: The original Cielo X provided a smooth, forgiving ride. The 2.0 feels pushy at slower paces, highlighting its race-focused design.
Tempo & intervals: This is where the 2.0 excels. The midsole and carbon plate combination keeps the stride efficient and energy return high, noticeably more responsive than the OG.
Racing: Lightweight and responsive, the 2.0 is clearly a racing tool. The original balanced racing with comfort, while the 2.0 prioritizes propulsion.
Long runs: Comfortable for longer miles, but best suited for marathon-pace or tempo runs. For slower, easy long runs, the OG still provides a forgiving experience.
Durability & Fit
The PEBA foam is durable enough for races and key workouts, but it won’t replace a daily trainer. The jacquard upper holds the midfoot securely, and the heel collar prevents rubbing. Compared to the OG, the 2.0 is slightly narrower, giving a performance-oriented fit without compromising comfort at speed.
Aesthetics & Price
The Frost/Black colorway is sleek and modern, while Frost/Lava adds flair. At $275, the Cielo X 2.0 sits firmly in the supershoe category. Whereas the original Cielo X offered more versatility across paces, the 2.0 commands attention as a focused racing machine.
Final Thoughts
The Cielo X 2.0 isn’t a replacement for the original—it’s a different tool. The original Cielo X excelled as a versatile racing shoe, ideal for easy runs, tempos, and travel. The 2.0 is a pure speed weapon: aggressive rocker, responsive foam, and carbon plate tuned for propulsion.
For runners targeting marathon PRs, half-marathons, or fast tempo runs, the 2.0 is outstanding. Those who appreciated the OG may want both: the original for easy runs, travel, and mixed paces, and the 2.0 for speed-focused training and racing.
Having spent time running long segments in the 2.0, it’s clear this shoe delivers on Hoka’s promise of propulsion, responsiveness, and racing-first design. Fast, efficient, and precise—it’s a shoe built for when every stride counts.